In a recent episode of the American Health Law Association’s Speaking of Health Law podcast, attorneys Stephen Lee and Jonathan Meltz offered a detailed look into a real-world healthcare fraud investigation tied to the Department of Justice’s Operation Brace Yourself. The discussion centered on two business owners who shut down their durable medical equipment (DME) companies in 2020. As Lee explained, “unfortunately and unbeknownst to the two owners, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had already opened a federal criminal investigation targeting them.”
Stephen Lee, a former federal prosecutor and senior counsel in the Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office Health Care Fraud Unit, teamed up with senior federal criminal defense attorney Jonathan Meltz of Chapman Law Group to represent the two owners. Their collaboration provided not only a defense strategy but also a valuable case study in how healthcare professionals and business owners can better navigate government scrutiny.
A significant portion of the podcast focused on the use of proffer interviews, an often-misunderstood step in the investigative process. “Proffers do come up a lot,” Lee explained, calling them “some of the most important parts of any white-collar or fraud investigation.” For owner two, a proffer interview arranged by a prior attorney marked his first real interaction with federal agents. Meltz noted that because they had not been present for the initial proffer, they had to prepare for the possibility that the government’s account might include contradictions or unverified statements.
Meltz further explained that proffers can both help and hurt defendants. While they offer a chance to clarify facts and potentially avoid indictment, they can also create legal risks if not handled with care. For healthcare providers unfamiliar with federal investigative procedures, a misstep during a proffer could result in unintended consequences.
During the podcast Jonathan outlined a few common characteristics of a proffer that can help a defendant, and their legal counsel, determine the best approach for the case:
The long delay between the owners shutting down their businesses and receiving word of an investigation was another key theme. “They had no clue what was going on,” Lee explained. That silence created a false sense of security for the owners, who thought ending operations had resolved their risk. In reality, the government had been quietly building its case for over a year.
This investigative lag is typical in healthcare fraud cases, and it underscores a critical point that just because you haven’t heard from the government doesn’t mean they haven’t heard of you. Business owners, particularly in healthcare sectors like DME, telehealth, or controlled substance distribution, should assume that recordkeeping, billing practices, and even internal emails may one day come under review.
For healthcare professionals, the message is clear. Understand the legal terrain before you’re forced to navigate it under pressure. As Meltz pointed out, even something as seemingly straightforward as helping a friend or colleague set up a healthcare business can expose you to unexpected legal risk if compliance isn’t carefully monitored from the beginning.
Healthcare is one of the most regulated industries in the U.S., and enforcement is only becoming more aggressive. This podcast episode makes clear that early legal intervention, clear documentation, and compliance first business planning are no longer optional, they are essential safeguards. Professionals who take a passive approach may find themselves at the center of investigations they never saw coming.
Proactive legal guidance during federal criminal investigations can be the difference between resolution and prosecution. At Chapman Law Group, we represent healthcare professionals and business owners targeted in fraud investigations involving DME, telehealth, controlled substances, and other high-risk areas. Our team includes former federal prosecutors and experienced federal criminal defense attorneys who understand how agencies build cases and how to respond effectively. If you’ve been contacted by federal agents, received a target letter, or are concerned about past business relationships or billing practices, call us today. We’re prepared to defend your career, your business, and your reputation.
Individuals depicted or heard in the foregoing media appearance or images may no longer be current attorneys, employees, members or affiliates with Chapman & Associates, PC or The Chapman Law Group (the “Firm”), including Ronald W. Chapman, II who is no longer affiliated with the Firm. For a current listing of the attorneys and services available with the Chapman Law Group, please see https://chapmanlawgroup.com/team.
"*" indicates required fields
Miami Office
701 Waterford Way, Suite 340
Miami, FL 33126
Phone: (305) 712-7177
Our federal criminal defense team helped secure a victory in the United States vs. Bothra case, equaling a $450M Acquittal. Here’s how they..
A Kentucky pain physician is acquitted of a nine-count indictment, including Unlawful Distribution and Health Care Fraud.
A Medicare plan administrator sought $250,000 from an ophthalmology practice after reimbursing incorrectly, but the arbitrator rejected the argument, calling its fee schedule “incomprehensible.”
