Chapman Law Group is dedicated to helping clients achieve the results they desire. We have a formidable track record litigating lawsuits — and we have even greater experience obtaining dismissals and settlements before trial.
We are most proud of our achievements in civil litigation defense. The vast majority of claims are dismissed before trial, while those that have gone before a jury all ended in no-causes for our clients. Our achievements are appropriate for each type of case and often exceed our client’s expectations.
Our Florida healthcare licensing attorneys provided the Board of Nursing with ample evidence proving that CBD can cause false positives and that there was no evidence of a nurse’s impairment.
Our healthcare criminal lawyers’ in-depth knowledge of addiction medicine gave our Pittsburgh-area client the best possible chance at acquittal on federal conspiracy and unlawful prescribing charges.
Our Medicare fraud attorneys obtained a reinstatement of billing privileges for a laboratory audited for billing $2 million in unnecessary services where there were alleged “credible allegations of fraud.”
The Court of Appeals gave a Michigan doctor back $6 million after he was charged in an alleged “pill mill” scheme, after the government claimed that property taken from him was derived from illegal activity.
Healthcare fraud charges against a pain management physician were dropped after a 3 1/2-year legal battle, which stemmed from a widespread Appalachian Regional Prescription Opioid Strike Force sweep.
An investigation was opened against the CRNA by the DOH, and our expert witness found that, despite patient’s death, our client had met the standard of care.
We at Chapman Law Group investigated the full-body therapy process and, with the therapist’s help, explained to the Board that he performed the process appropriately.
The court granted a Motion for Summary Judgment in a deliberate indifference case involving a prisoner who died from an atypical abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Defendant doctors were not deliberately indifferent under a federal court’s new test, as their medical judgment was reasonable and did not demonstrate a level of wantonness to warrant a constitutional violation.
Decedent, who had a history of mental health and substance abuse issues, died from an overdose when placed in general population.
After investigating and interviewing employees and patients, and reviewing patient’s story for accuracy, we determined the patient was not sexually harassed by our client, and the state investigator agreed.
We were able to quickly gather enough favorable testimony and evidence supporting the RN’s case regarding his reasons for refusing the drug screen, and evidence of diversion was actually just a documentation error.
As this Michigan nurse’s case shows, we have extensive knowledge and experience to maneuver the nuances of the Michigan Administrative Hearings System to our clients’ advantage.
Our RN client was able to explain the high-usage Pyxis report due to his position as a charge nurse and preceptor in the ICU, and there was no evidence of drug use.
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
5250 Lankershim Blvd.
Ste. 500
North Hollywood, CA 91601
T. 305.712.7177
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Suite 120
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
701 Waterford Way
Suite 340
Miami, FL 33126
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
