Case Result: Nurse Who Tested Positive for THC Avoids IPN Referral
After long negotiations, we were able to convince the Department of Nursing to settle the case with a reprimand, a small fine, and eight hours of continuing education classes.
Ronald W. Chapman Sr., M.P.A., LL.M.
Founding Shareholder
President & CEO
Complex Healthcare Fraud, Qui Tam,
Uninsured Physicians
All Offices – Main Office Sarasota
6841 Energy Court
Sarasota, FL 34240
Phone: (941) 893-3449
After long negotiations, we were able to convince the Department of Nursing to settle the case with a reprimand, a small fine, and eight hours of continuing education classes.
The nurse’s employer accused him of not wasting multiple drugs, specifically Dilaudid and Morphine. Our attorneys asserted that the real problem was the hospital’s faulty computer system.
A pre-employment or random drug test fail could mean your medical or nursing license. But don’t turn to the impairment program first — do this instead.
Professional:
Registered Nurse
Primary Issue:
An RN was accused of suspected drug abuse related to long-term use of narcotics for congenital abnormality. The RN, without advice of counsel, agreed to IPN monitoring. Following two months of intensive therapy, IPN demanded a five-year contract. The RN refused and was reported as non-compliant with IPN. The Board of Nursing issued a complaint and demanded the RN enroll in IPN.
Benefit of Using Chapman Law Group:
The RN retained our attorneys to defend her in the Board of Nursing complaint for alleged drug use. We reviewed the entire investigative file, including the original IPN evaluator report. We also reviewed every medical and counseling record. During the review, it was clear the original evaluator did not recommend inpatient therapy or any therapy at all. In spite of this, IPN intentionally mischaracterized the evaluation and told the RN that the evaluator recommended therapy and a long-term monitoring contract — but the evaluator had only recommended education to counsel the RN on possible long-term complications of narcotic use. We filed a motion to dismiss and demanded a hearing or the reconsideration of the case by the Board of Nursing Probable Cause Panel.
Result:
The Board of Nursing Probable Cause Panel reconsidered the case and dismissed the investigation, finding no probable cause.
Areas of Law:
Nursing License Defense
Substance Abuse Matters
Intervention Project for Nurses (IPN)
Disclaimer:
This information is a sample of our past results. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different and each case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. The circumstances of your case may differ from the results provided. The information provided has not been reviewed or approved by the State Bar.
"*" indicates required fields
Ronald W. Chapman Sr., M.P.A., LL.M.
Founding Shareholder
President & CEO
Complex Healthcare Fraud, Qui Tam,
Uninsured Physicians
All Offices – Main Office Sarasota
6841 Energy Court
Sarasota, FL 34240
Phone: (941) 893-3449
After long negotiations, we were able to convince the Department of Nursing to settle the case with a reprimand, a small fine, and eight hours of continuing education classes.
The nurse’s employer accused him of not wasting multiple drugs, specifically Dilaudid and Morphine. Our attorneys asserted that the real problem was the hospital’s faulty computer system.
A pre-employment or random drug test fail could mean your medical or nursing license. But don’t turn to the impairment program first — do this instead.
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
5250 Lankershim Blvd.
Ste. 500
North Hollywood, CA 91601
T. (818) 287-0576
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Suite 120
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
701 Waterford Way
Suite 340
Miami, FL 33126
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED