Ronald W. Chapman Sr., M.P.A., LL.M.
Founding Shareholder
President & CEO
Complex Healthcare Fraud, Qui Tam,
Uninsured Physician Matters, Compliance
All Offices – Main Office Sarasota
6841 Energy Court
Sarasota, FL 34240
Phone: (941) 893-3449
The court granted summary judgment for lawsuit alleging inmate was denied narcotic pain medication and removal of broken spinal hardware.
The Court determined that the facts — including Plaintiff’s admitted refusal of the medical care offered and his disagreement with the treatment plan — did not provide a basis for a deliberate indifference claim.
Professionals:
Physician
Nurses Practitioner
Physician Assistant
Correctional Healthcare Provider
Areas of Law:
42 USC § 1983 — Deliberate Indifference
Correctional Healthcare
Benefit of Using Chapman Law Group:
Chapman Law Group was able to secure an early dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) due to deficiencies in the Complaint.
Result:
The Court dismissed all claims against our clients. The Court determined Plaintiff’s allegations that he received insufficient treatment for a plantar wart were not sufficient to state a deliberate indifference claim.
Disclaimer:
The information is a sample of our past results. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different and each case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. The circumstances of your case may differ from the results provided. The information provided has not been reviewed or approved by the State Bar.
"*" indicates required fields
Ronald W. Chapman Sr., M.P.A., LL.M.
Founding Shareholder
President & CEO
Complex Healthcare Fraud, Qui Tam,
Uninsured Physician Matters, Compliance
All Offices – Main Office Sarasota
6841 Energy Court
Sarasota, FL 34240
Phone: (941) 893-3449
The court granted summary judgment for lawsuit alleging inmate was denied narcotic pain medication and removal of broken spinal hardware.
The Court determined that the facts — including Plaintiff’s admitted refusal of the medical care offered and his disagreement with the treatment plan — did not provide a basis for a deliberate indifference claim.
