Case Lawyers

Ronald W. Chapman Sr. M.P.A., LL.M.

Founding Shareholder

President & CEO

All Offices – Main Office Sarasota
6841 Energy Ct.
Sarasota, FL 34240
Phone: (941) 893-3449

Related Providers

Related Case Results

Germain Skinner v Client

Plaintiff claims that Bay Medical Center was not the “best choice” for his medical care because Plaintiff needed to be sent to the University of Michigan Medical Center. He further asserts that Defendants cut corners in order to save money by sending him to Bay Medical Center instead of the University of Michigan Medical Center.

Read More »

Related Posts

Case Result: Verdict in Favor of Physician Accused of Failing to Treat Severe Pain from Inguinal Hernia

John Colton v Clients (treating physician)

Area of Law:
Civil Rights 42 U.S.C. §1983, based on the failure to treat a right inguinal hernia

U. S. District Court, Eastern District

Gerald Rosen, Chief Judge

Cotton Correctional

Plaintiff alleged the physician ignored his alleged severe pain and allegations that his previous right inguinal hernia surgical repair had failed. Plaintiff alleged significant pain and suffering for 3 years. He alleged he should have had inguinal hernia surgery as early as Oct. 2009. He also demanded right inguinal hernia surgery. Defense alleged plaintiff never reported pain and in fact a hernia that is not incarcerated or strangled is not a serious medical need. Pursuant to Napier Plaintiff must produce expert support that a delay in treatment proximately caused additional damages.

Settlement history:
Plaintiff demanded $20,000. We rejected.

Trial started on 10/27/14 and ended 10/29/14. At the close of Plaintiff’s proofs we moved for a Directed Verdict. The court deferred until after Defense proofs. Following defense proofs the court granted the motion for Directed Verdict.

Bases for Relief:
The court accepted our argument that this was a Napier case and not a Blackmore case; therefore, Plaintiff needed medical testimony to support the fact that the medical condition worsened as a result of the delay. Plaintiff was unable to prove same.

Chance of Appeal:
60% chance Plaintiff will file a Pro Se appeal. 1% chance he will be successful.

This information is a sample of our past results. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different and each case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. The circumstances of your case may differ from the results provided. The information provided has not been reviewed or approved by the State Bar.

Do You Have A Related Issue? Contact Us Now!


  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Send this to a friend