Area of Law:
42 USC 1983 – Deliberate Indifference
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion granted. Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
This case involves a dispute concerning the adequacy of prison meals. A prisoner sued a correctional health care company, corrections defendants and correctional food service vendors, alleging that the prison diet violates the U.S. Constitution and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The prisoner claimed that the diet served was not adequate to sustain normal health due to processed foods replacing produce and smaller portions being provided. The plaintiff alleged that our client, the correctional health care company, was responsible for reviewing and approving the prison diet. In fact, that was not part of the correctional health care company’s role per the contract or per Department of Corrections policy. The contract attached to the pleadings contradicted Plaintiff’s allegations. All counts against the correctional health care company were dismissed.
This information is a sample of our past results. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different and each case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. The circumstances of your case may differ from the results provided. The information provided has not been reviewed or approved by the State Bar.