Case Lawyers

Ronald W. Chapman Sr. M.P.A., LL.M.

Founding Shareholder

President & CEO

All Offices – Main Office Sarasota
6841 Energy Ct.
Sarasota, FL 34240
Phone: (941) 893-3449

Related Providers

Related Case Results

Walter and Brooke Rycerz v Clients

Plaintiff fell on ice and severely re-fractured his lower leg. Plaintiff alleges that clients failed to properly treat his fractured leg. Plaintiff had a very difficult fracture to repair and clients did not breach any standard of care during his treatment nor did clients act negligently or cause Plaintiff’s damages.

Read More »

Christine Lee Schneemilch et al v Clients

Plaintiff alleged clients misread a mammogram, resulting in delay in diagnosing breast cancer. We argued that Plaintiff failed to allege proximate cause and the trial court granted our Motion for Summary Disposition.

Read More »

Cameron Fitts v Clients

The Magistrate Judge properly found that Plaintiff had failed to show any evidence of deliberate indifference as to Defendant’s treatment of his Hepatitis C, where there was uncontradicted evidence that the doctor had provided treatment both before and after the alleged denial of treatment.

Read More »

Case Result: Peter Raub v Client

Area of Law:
Civil Rights 42 U.S.C. §1983

Venue:
Eastern District of Michigan

Verdict:
Dismissed on motion

Details:
Plaintiff asserts that there was a serious need for his prison doctor to disclose the Hepatitis C infection to Plaintiff and other treating medical personnel as soon as that information became available. Plaintiff claims that the doctor withheld the Hepatitis C diagnosis for over five months while other doctors prescribed medications contraindicated with the Hepatitis C infection. It is the withholding of information, then, that Plaintiff claims violated his Eighth Amendment rights. To succeed on his claim, the Court explained that the Plaintiff must establish that the doctor was so deliberately indifferent to his serious medical need that he “unnecessarily and wantonly inflicted pain.” Setting aside the issue of whether the doctor withheld information regarding Plaintiff’s Hepatitis C infection with deliberate indifference, the Plaintiff still failed to establish that the doctor’s withholding of information inflicted unnecessary pain. Further, once the doctor disclosed to Plaintiff and other treating medical personnel that Plaintiff was positive for Hepatitis C, nothing about Plaintiff’s condition or treatment changed which showed any withheld information did not affect his treatment.

Disclaimer:
This information is a sample of our past results. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different and each case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. The circumstances of your case may differ from the results provided. The information provided has not been reviewed or approved by the State Bar.

Do You Have A Related Issue? Contact Us Now!

.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Case Lawyers

Ronald W. Chapman Sr. M.P.A., LL.M.

Founding Shareholder

President & CEO

All Offices – Main Office Sarasota
6841 Energy Ct.
Sarasota, FL 34240
Phone: (941) 893-3449

Related Providers

Related Case Results

Walter and Brooke Rycerz v Clients

Plaintiff fell on ice and severely re-fractured his lower leg. Plaintiff alleges that clients failed to properly treat his fractured leg. Plaintiff had a very difficult fracture to repair and clients did not breach any standard of care during his treatment nor did clients act negligently or cause Plaintiff’s damages.

Read More »

Christine Lee Schneemilch et al v Clients

Plaintiff alleged clients misread a mammogram, resulting in delay in diagnosing breast cancer. We argued that Plaintiff failed to allege proximate cause and the trial court granted our Motion for Summary Disposition.

Read More »

Cameron Fitts v Clients

The Magistrate Judge properly found that Plaintiff had failed to show any evidence of deliberate indifference as to Defendant’s treatment of his Hepatitis C, where there was uncontradicted evidence that the doctor had provided treatment both before and after the alleged denial of treatment.

Read More »

Send this to a friend