On February 9, 2018, President Trump signed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (“BBA”) into law. The legislation contains significant changes to Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health care programs, as well as three significant changes to Stark Law.
First, a little background. Stark Law, as originally enacted in 1989, is designed to prevent self-referrals between physicians or groups of physicians unless they comply with a strict set of not-so-easy-to-understand rules. The drafters of Stark believed that self-referrals among physicians would increase the cost of health care by encouraging unnecessary medical care.
From 1989 until 2007, Stark was modified in three major phases: I, II and III), and from 2007 through 2018, Stark regulations were modified several times. The scope of the Stark Law, together with the piecemeal changes, make the law difficult to understand and implement.
Beginning with the BBA and ending with the June 20, 2018, CMS Request for Information (“RFI”), Congress and CMS may be signaling their desire to bring Stark into the 21st century. The moves would allow modification that take into account more efficient and modern business structures that are focused on streamlining the medical delivery process, access and cost.
If you are a physician, dentist, pharmacist, pain management specialist, chiropractor, or another licensed medical professional, these are new developments you will need to understand.
Stark Law requires that agreements that fall into the safe harbor provisions must be in writing and executed by the parties. Prior to the BBA changes, it was argued the writing needed to be a single contractual document that complied with strict Stark Law requirements.
Several Qui Tam cases were brought against health care providers, arguing the failure of the writing requirement was not insubstantial and, therefore, the absence of the signed writing could give rise to a successful false claims suit. The courts struggled with the rule and often the health care provider was left to pay the price
The BBA did not change the need for an executed writing, but it did make it clear that the writing requirement could be satisfied with a series of documents that show the existence of a signed agreement that complies with Stark Law regulations.
The BBA modification states, “… by a collection of documents, including contemporaneous documents evidencing the course of conduct between the parties involved.”
The Stark Law writing requirement is not in line with contract law and the basic steps necessary to prove the existence of a contract.
Prior to the BBA clarification, the signature requirement was often confusing, using language related to noncompliance, inadvertent noncompliance, and not-inadvertent noncompliance.
The new rule allows claims submission when the signature requirement is missing provided, “… not later than 90 consecutive calendar days immediately after the date on which the compensation arrangement became noncompliant (without regard to whether any referrals occur or compensation is paid during such 90-day period) and the compensation arrangement otherwise complies with all criteria of the applicable exception.” 42 CFR 411.357(g)
The BBA modified Stark to allow holdover and expired PSA agreements to indefinitely meet the requirements of Stark exception to office space, rental agreements, and PSAs. The agreement must have been for at least one year, and all other terms of the agreement must meet the Stark exception criteria.
On June 20, 2018, CMS issued a Request for Information seeking public comment from the health care industry on the burdens of complying with Stark Law.
Kelly Cleary, HHS Office of General Counsel, stated that CMS was interested in exploring possible ways to remove the burdens of Stark law compliance while maintaining the integrity of the act.
CMS signaled its interest in reducing the cost of compliance with respect to paperwork, etc. and to remove Stark as an impediment to creative delivery arrangements that increase health care access through coordinated care delivery models and limit the amount of waste and abuse.
CMS stated it is particularly interested in financial arrangements that create alternative payment models that use “value-based” incentives and shared savings programs. CMS stated its intent to better understand provider concerns and target its regulator efforts to address those concerns.
CMS Administrator Seema Verma proclaimed: “[W]e are looking for information and bold ideas on how to change the existing regulations to reduce provider burden and put patients in the driver’s seat.”
The RFI created 20 open-ended questions for which CMS is seeking input, such as:
At Chapman Law Group, all we do is focused on the healthcare industry across the U.S. Our national Stark Law lawyers are experts in making sure your practice is up to date on, and not running afoul of, the rules and regulations.
We are committed to making sure that national licensed health care professionals are staying in compliance. Contact us today for a consultation and to show what we can do for you.
"*" indicates required fields
Los Angeles Office
5250 Lankershim Blvd., Ste. 500
North Hollywood, CA 91601
Phone: (248) 644-6326
The government made things easier for healthcare providers who want to end fee-for-service and go the value-based or coordinated care route.
New healthcare business ventures can easily, sometimes unknowingly run afoul of Stark Law, Anti-Kickback, and the False Claims Act. Here’s how to be sure you are being fully compliant and not violating any state and federal laws.
Here’s why it’s important to take a closer look at whether your medical practice is staying compliant — and not engaging in kickbacks in health care.
Many providers are unaware of requirements for fitting within the Anti-Kickback Employee Safe Harbor — specifically, what constitutes an “employee.”
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
5250 Lankershim Blvd.
Ste. 500
North Hollywood, CA 91601
T. (818) 287-0576
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Suite 120
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
701 Waterford Way
Suite 340
Miami, FL 33126
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
