Medicaid provider fraud is a unique focus area of health care fraud prosecutions. Highly specialized law enforcement teams are focused exclusively on carrying out a Medicaid fraud investigation, targeting providers who bill Medicaid for health care products and services.
State and federal investigations and audits involving provider billing can result in career-ending criminal charges or civil liabilities. If you are a health care professional serving Medicaid patients, here is what you need to know.
Medicaid is administered by the states, with federal funding and oversight. Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) are state law enforcement agencies; 49 states and the District of Columbia have MFCUs, many of which are part of each state’s attorney general’s office.
MFCUs have authority under their respective state and federal laws to investigate and prosecute violations of all applicable state laws pertaining to the provision of medical assistance and the activities of providers under state Medicaid plans. Although each state statute is slightly different, MFCU investigations always involve:
MFCUs investigate providers such as doctors, nurses, pharmacies, DME companies, dentists, counselors, hospitals, home health agencies and others. Patients are not investigated, except in circumstances where the patient and provider conspired or collaborated to commit Medicaid fraud.
Each MFCU employs a team of attorneys, investigators and auditors. The MFCU is not a part of the state Medicaid program, and the state program has no authority concerning these prosecutions. In fact, the MFCU has the authority to investigate and prosecute fraud within the administration of the state Medicaid program itself.
Although the MFCU and state Medicaid are separate by design, they work closely to accomplish the common goal of combating fraud and recovering money. In particular, the MFCU collaborates with the state Medicaid program integrity offices (the people who conduct audits to identify and recoup overpayments).
While both the MFCU and state program may investigate similar conduct regarding improper billing, the state program must refer all cases of suspected fraud to the MFCU.
MFCUs are unique in that their cases can result in criminal prosecutions and/or civil lawsuits in which providers are sued under the False Claims Act. That determination is made based on the nature and quality of the evidence (i.e., whether there is sufficient proof of intent to defraud).
Alternatively, when there is weak evidence of fraud to support either a criminal or civil case, the MFCU might end up closing an investigation and referring the matter to its state Medicaid program integrity office for collection of overpayments.
Providers should be aware that MFCU investigations can result in simultaneous criminal charges and civil lawsuits, sometimes known as “parallel proceedings.” As such, providers can face more than one battlefront arising out of the same set of facts and face both prison time as well as hefty civil monetary penalties.
On the criminal front, each state has a criminal statute specifically criminalizing the knowing or purposeful submission of false or fraudulent claims to Medicaid, sometimes called “Provider Fraud” or “Medicaid Fraud.” Just like any prosecution, MFCUs can also charge any state crime as may be appropriate under the circumstances, such as theft or computer crime.
Medicaid provider fraud prosecuted at the state level can be a felony or misdemeanor, depending on the state law. In some states, it is a felony regardless of the amount involved.
It is important to note that Medicaid fraud cases can be investigated and prosecuted by federal agencies as well. In many instances, such cases involve additional aspects such as Medicare fraud, private insurance fraud, or drug diversion. It is not unusual to see multiagency collaboration among MFCUs, the HHS-OIG, the FBI, the DEA and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices.
On the civil front, most states have enacted some version of a False Claims Act, similar or identical to the federal corollary. False Claims lawsuits allow the government to recover treble damages and impose civil monetary penalties.
There is one main difference between a criminal case and a civil case. Criminal cases must demonstrate proof of intent to defraud beyond a reasonable doubt. Civil cases, however, require less proof of intent and can be won by demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that a provider was merely reckless in the submission of false claims to Medicaid.
The protocols will differ slightly from state to state. The MFCU may obtain records by subpoena or search warrant, but most often such collection of evidence is accomplished by a written request in the form of a letter. If you receive a record request, it may be that you are a target of an investigation, or your records are needed for other evidentiary reasons.
Many state statutes authorize the MFCU to enter upon the premises of a Medicaid provider and access records and files relevant to the MFCU investigation. Depending on the nature of the investigation, this may include Medicaid and non-Medicaid patient charts or business records, such as provider and patient schedules and billing records.
The written requests may be delivered in person without advance notice by MFCU personnel, requesting immediate access to such records for inspection and copying. The requests also could be mailed or faxed.
In addition to state statutes authorizing MFCU access to records, Medicaid provider agreements requite providers to furnish to the MFCU any requested records supporting payments for services. As a contracted Medicaid provider, you are under obligation to maintain documentation to support claims for services billed to the Medicaid program. Failure to furnish these records to the MFCU may result in exclusion from federally funded health care programs.
If you are presented with a request for access to your records, you should be polite and cooperative. It is illegal to obstruct a lawful investigation and may lead to criminal charges. However, you may ask to verify the identity of MFCU personnel.
As your staff assists in accommodating requests with minimal disruption to business operations, you should call an attorney experienced with Medicaid fraud investigations to understand your rights and obligations, as well as any criminal and civil liabilities that you or your practice might face.
Disclosure of protected health information pursuant to a request from the MFCU does not violate the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
Several exceptions to the HIPAA Privacy Rule apply, allowing disclosures to be made to the MFCU. First, Medicaid providers’ cooperation with the MFCU pursuant to its investigative authority is required by law. Second, MFCUs are considered health oversight agencies. Third, MFCUs are law enforcement agencies, and, depending upon the nature of the investigation, this exception to the Privacy Rule might apply.
Separate and apart from HIPAA, substance abuse records have special protections under federal law. MFCU authority to access substance abuse records may be curtailed by special federal privacy laws, depending entirely upon the nature of the MFCU investigation.
If your practice involves substance abuse diagnosis or treatment — including alcohol, painkillers or smoking cessation — be aware that there are special restrictions on disclosures, even to law enforcement, without a court order. You should consult an attorney familiar with substance abuse record laws for guidance on these matters.
State and federal investigations and audits involving provider billing can result in career-ending criminal charges or civil liabilities. It is crucial to consult with an experienced legal team as soon as government investigators make contact with your business, in order to understand your rights, obligations and exposure.
We at Chapman Law Group have an extensive track record in health care fraud cases, regularly representing medical professionals in courts across the nation. Our team includes former health care fraud prosecutors who, in addition to criminal defense, work on medical practice management, compliance and provider billing matters.
We represent licensed medical professionals, including:
Whether you practice in Michigan (Detroit, Dearborn, Troy, Ann Arbor, Lansing and Grand Rapids, among many more areas), and Florida (including Miami, Orlando, Tampa, West Palm Beach and Jacksonville), or nationally in regions including Los Angeles and Southern California, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Washington, D.C., we are ready to put our experience to work for you. Contact us today to learn more.
Senior Attorney
Miami Office
1001 Brickell Bay Drive, Suite 1714
Miami, FL 33131
Phone: (305) 712-7177
Two physicians were charged with unlawfully prescribing while working at Redirections Treatment Advocates (RTA) in Wierton, WV. Based on our specific experience in defending addiction medicine providers, Ron Chapman II was asked to join the trial team on this case and other companion cases.
CRNA was falsely accused of stealing large amounts of drugs (a strong narcotic) and using it while at work. CRNA was tested and failed a drug test. The CRNA was terminated for stealing drugs (drug diversion) and her license was subsequently suspended by LARA.
The Ohio Attorney General’s Special Prosecution section charged an Ohio doctor with operating a pill mill. The indictment included over 100 predicate acts, including drug trafficking, RICO (engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity), and conspiracy charges arising from the operation of an Ohio pain management clinic.
In 2009, the Florida Legislature passed a bill creating Florida Statute (F.S.) section 456.0635. Its purpose was to prevent heathcare fraud and establish penalties for
Why am I Being Targeted? Over the last decade, federal and state prosecutors have arrested and charged several thousand physicians with criminal violations related to
DOJ Has Recovered $34 Billion Since 1986. Settlements Can Reach in the Millions. As a Licensed Medical Professional, What Should You Know? The Federal False Claims
The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) makes it a crime for a person to unlawfully dispense or distribute a Schedule II controlled substance and provides for
On Friday, July 27th the Federal Register will publish proposed rule changes to the CMS Part B Physician Fee Schedule. If adopted, the new rules
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
1001 Brickell Bay Drive
Suite 1714
Miami, FL 33131
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Send this to a friend
