The United States Sentencing Commission’s recent adoption of Amendment 821 represents a landmark shift in federal sentencing guidelines. Healthcare professionals and others facing federal prosecution, particularly those embroiled in federal criminal cases, now find themselves with new avenues for potentially reducing their prison sentences. This article aims to demystify Amendment 821, shedding light on its ramifications for federal sentence reduction and post-conviction relief.
Amendment 821 brings changes to the way criminal history points (federal offense levels) are calculated and how cooperation with authorities is rewarded, among other factors. These changes can significantly affect sentencing outcomes for healthcare professionals facing federal charges, including those related to healthcare fraud. The amendment was passed with a delayed retroactive application, effective beginning February 1st, 2024.
The term “delayed retroactive application” refers to the Amendments future implementation effective starting February 1st, 2024, while the retroactivity means that the amendment can be applied to individuals already serving sentences, potentially making them eligible for reduced sentences based on the new guidelines. The delay provides the legal system with ample time to prepare for the changes, allowing for orderly case reviews, resources allocation, and other administrative adjustments.
Sometimes referred to as “points” the offense level is a numerical value between 1 and 43 that is determined based on various factors related to the crime committed, such as its severity, the defendant’s role in the crime, and other specific offense characteristics. This offense level is then used in conjunction with the defendant’s criminal history category to determine the sentencing range under the federal guidelines.
The total number of points determines the guideline range for sentencing, expressed in months (e.g., 24-30 months), though there is no straightforward “years per point” calculation. The sentencing range is determined by cross-referencing the total points with the defendant’s criminal history on the Sentencing Table. Points are added or subtracted based on the offense’s specific characteristics and the defendant’s background. For instance, a defendant might receive additional points for leading a criminal activity but could have points subtracted for accepting responsibility for the offense.
Those facing healthcare fraud prosecution or other federal criminal charges can potentially benefit from Amendment 821 if file a 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce their sentence. That statutory provision allows a defendant to petition the court where they were sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o). The intricate framework of Amendment 821, Part A aims to curtail the influence of “Status Points,”(offense levels) as outlined in section §4A1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
Part B, Subpart 1 of Amendment 821, introduces a fresh guideline within Chapter Four, designated as §4C1.1. This new section lowers the offense levels by two points for defendants who have no criminal history points(levels) and whose current offense lacks particular aggravating elements. Chapter Four of the Sentencing Guidelines encompasses the rules and regulations related to a defendant’s criminal history and its impact on sentencing.
In short, Amendment 821 not only mitigates the weight of “Status Points” as per §4A1.1 but also provides relief through a new Chapter Four guideline, §4C1.1, targeting defendants with minimal or no prior criminal history and offenses devoid of certain aggravating conditions. So whether you’re currently incarcerated or in the midst of prosecution, Amendment 821 may offer avenues for sentence reductions, assuming eligibility such as;
The adoption of Amendment 821 has direct implications for healthcare professionals entangled in federal criminal cases. With this amendment, the opportunity for federal sentence reduction is broadened, assuming that all eligibility criteria are met. The Commission is also actively reviewing and potentially amending how guidelines treat acquitted conduct and the effectiveness of certain Bureau of Prisons practices.
“The Commission also adopted its next set of policy priorities that include, among other things, reviewing and potentially amending how the guidelines treat acquitted conduct for purposes of sentencing as well as assessing the degree to which certain Bureau of Prisons practices are effective in meeting the purposes of sentencing.”
Healthcare professionals often find themselves subject to numerous healthcare fraud related laws, such as the False Claims Act or the Anti-Kickback Statute. Amendment 821 could provide a glimmer of hope to those who may be convicted under these statutes.
If someone is facing charges for healthcare fraud, the recent reduction in points might mean that they’re now eligible for a lower sentencing range if convicted. A motion could be filed to request the court to consider this new guideline range.
For individuals already sentenced, a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for reduction of sentence might be applicable. If they were sentenced based on a higher point calculation and the new guidelines offer a lower range for their offense and circumstances, they might be eligible for a reduced sentence.
A motion is a formal request made to a court for an order or judgment. When someone “files a motion,” they’re asking the court to make a specific decision related to the case. In this instance it would be a 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction and appealing through Amendment 821 using whatever defense strategy your Post Conviction Attorney has laid out for you. The motion is drafted, often by said attorney, and submitted to the court. It typically contains the legal arguments and evidence supporting the requested action. And though one without legal qualification could file their own motion, it is likely within your best interest to have your Post Conviction Lawyer draft and file motions due to the complexity of legal procedures and the serious stakes involved.
Generally, there are often specific times or stages in a legal process when motions can be filed. Some motions require leave (permission) from the court. Given the amendment’s delayed retroactive application, defendants or their Post Conviction Attorneys can file a motion for sentence reduction or “Post Conviction Relief” starting from February 1, 2024. This is also applicable to those still in the process of being prosecuted. However, consulting a knowledgeable federal Post Conviction Relief Attorney is crucial for understanding the specifics.
Amendment 821 has ushered in changes that could affect the federal sentencing guidelines and thereby the fate of those facing federal criminal charges including healthcare professionals. Legal experts and Post Conviction Relief Lawyers are already gearing up to leverage this amendment to the benefit of their clients. It is advisable to consult a specialized Post Conviction Relief Lawyer near you to explore these new avenues. Chapman Law Group has a track record spanning over 35 years and a team fully dedicated to Federal Criminal Defense. If you would like to see if you qualify for the benefits listed under Amendment 821, then give us a call today and get a one on one consultation with one of our seasoned Attorneys.
"*" indicates required fields
A Kentucky pain physician is acquitted of a nine-count indictment, including Unlawful Distribution and Health Care Fraud.
Our healthcare criminal lawyers’ in-depth knowledge of addiction medicine allowed our physician client to have the best possible chance at acquittal.
Healthcare fraud charges against a pain management physician were dropped after a 3 1/2-year legal battle, which stemmed from a widespread Appalachian Regional Prescription Opioid Strike Force sweep.
The United States Sentencing Commission has recently approved Amendment 821, Post Conviction Relief starting February 1st, 2024.
Our client, a home health business manager convicted of $2 million in healthcare fraud, was able to serve just three months of his 36-month sentence, arguing for “compassionate release” due to his age and health condition.
The government claimed that property taken from Dr. Joseph Oesterling was derived from illegal activity, but the appellate court struck the argument down.
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
5250 Lankershim Blvd.
Ste. 500
North Hollywood, CA 91601
T. (818) 287-0576
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Suite 120
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
701 Waterford Way
Suite 340
Miami, FL 33126
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
