When you’re facing a federal conviction, the appellate process is your next battleground. Your best bet will be hiring a federal supreme court appellate defense lawyer that specializes in this intricate area of law. The appeals process is not just a second chance to argue your case; it’s a highly specialized field that requires a deep understanding of federal laws and procedures. A federal appellate attorney can identify legal errors made during the trial, craft compelling arguments to challenge those errors, and present your case in the most effective manner before the appellate judges. Their skills and expertise are essential for navigating the complexities of federal appellate law especially for physicians fighting healthcare fraud charges.
In this article we list out everything you need to know to help make you more informed about the appellate process, how to potentially reduce your sentence post conviction, and who you should put your trust in when battling it out in the courtroom. We start with the three pillars of the appellate process, the “Writ of Certiorari”, the “Appellate Brief”, and the “Oral Arguments.”
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A) governs this time period. Generally, after you have been convicted you have 14 days from the date of the conviction to file a notice of an appeal with the federal circuit court ofaAppeals in your jurisdiction.
Traditionally, if you did not execute an appellate waiver with a plea agreement, your attorney should file a claim of appeal to preserve your appeal.
A Writ of Certiorari is a formal request submitted to a higher court, asking it to review the decision of a lower court. It’s the legal mechanism that kicks off the appellate process at the Supreme Court level. The term “certiorari” comes from Latin and means “to be informed of”, or “to be made certain in regard to.”
This is often easier said than done, as the Supreme Court receives thousands of petitions each year but hears only a fraction of them. Your Writ of Certiorari needs to highlight compelling reasons for the court to take up your case, such as legal errors in the lower court’s decision that could have a broader impact on jurisprudence.
Yes, the Writ of Certiorari has specific formatting and content requirements. It usually includes the questions presented, a list of parties involved, the opinions below, and the reasons for granting the petition. Failure to adhere to these guidelines can result in the petition being dismissed.
Timing is crucial when it comes to filing a Writ of Certiorari. Generally, you have 90 days from the date of the lower court’s final judgment to file this petition. Missing this deadline can result in losing the opportunity to appeal.
An Appellate Brief is a written document submitted to the appellate court that outlines the legal arguments for why the lower court’s decision should be affirmed or reversed. The Appellate Brief is a more detailed exposition of your legal arguments and supporting evidence.
No, it’s not the same. While a Writ of Certiorari serves as a request for the higher court to review your case, the Appellate Brief is the actual presentation of your case’s merits. Think of the Writ as the “application” and the Appellate Brief as the first “interview.”
No, an appellate brief is a written legal argument submitted by one of the parties involved in the appeal, while an “amicus curiae” brief, or “friend of the court” brief, is submitted by a third party—a person or organization not directly involved in the case but interested in its outcome. The purpose of an amicus brief is to provide the court with additional perspectives, legal arguments, or information that the court might find useful in making its decision. These briefs are commonly used in cases that have broader social, political, or legal implications.
The goal of the Appellate Brief is to persuade the appellate judges that the lower court’s decision was incorrect and should be reversed, or that it was correct and should be affirmed. It’s your opportunity to present a comprehensive legal argument, complete with case law, statutes, and evidence that supports your position.
Yes, much like the Writ of Certiorari, the Appellate Brief has specific formatting and content requirements. These often include sections like the Statement of the Case, Argument, and Conclusion. Each section serves a specific purpose and should be crafted carefully to meet the court’s guidelines.
Yes, once the appellate court agrees to hear your case, you’ll have a set timeframe within which to submit your Appellate Brief. This can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules of the appellate court you’re dealing with.
Oral arguments are a critical phase in the appellate process, often serving as the last opportunity to persuade appellate judges. Unlike the written briefs, oral arguments provide a dynamic platform for attorneys to interact directly with the judges. The goal is to clarify points made in the appellate briefs, answer judges’ questions, and emphasize the strongest aspects of the case.
The primary goal of an oral argument is to persuade the appellate court that your position is the correct one. It’s not just about reiterating what’s in the briefs; it’s about making a compelling case for why the lower court’s decision should be upheld or reversed.
Absolutely. Experienced appellate attorneys often employ various strategies during oral arguments. They anticipate questions that judges may ask and prepare concise, persuasive responses. They also listen carefully to the judges’ questions and comments, as these can provide valuable insights into what the court is focusing on. In the context of Chapman Law Group’s experience, the attorneys have had significant success in presenting oral arguments at various appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court.
Yes, trial counsel generally has the duty to “preserve” issues for appeal, meaning they must object to errors at the trial level to raise them later in an appeal. Failure to preserve an issue results in the unfavorable standard of review, known as plain error. Under that standard, the appellant must show that the trial court’s error was plain/obvious. In the context of federal criminal appeals, preserving issues can be a strategic move that sets the groundwork for a federal appellate lawyers success later on.
While your trial lawyer may be skilled in trial court proceedings, appellate law is a specialized field. It may be beneficial to consult or hire a specialized federal appeals attorney, and more specifically one who has a strong track record dealing with federal courts and who has access to an appellate practice team. This means that they are more familiar with the intricacies of appellate rules, procedures, and the ways in which the federal appellate courts operate.
Federal circuit courts of appeals are governed by region:
Losing an appellate case can be disheartening, but it’s not necessarily the end of the road. Depending on your circumstances, a competent federal appellate counsel knows there are several options you can explore to continue fighting for your justice. Listed below are some of the next steps your appellate lawyer can take to combat the appellate courts decision.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus is fundamentally different from a Writ of Certiorari. While the latter is a request for a higher court to review a lower court’s decision, a Writ of Habeas Corpus is a legal mechanism to levy a constitutional challenge of someone’s detention or imprisonment. It’s a constitutional safeguard against detention.
Each of these options comes with its own set of rules, procedures, and likelihood of success. Consulting with an experienced appellate lawyer can provide valuable insights into which avenue may be most appropriate for your case.
Selecting the right federal appellate lawyer is crucial. You need someone with a track record of success in federal appellate cases. Chapman Law Group has a seasoned roster of appellate attorneys who have experience representing defendants in the United States Supreme Court, the Federal Court of Appeals, and winning.
Cases like these not only showcase the firm’s expertise but also emphasize the critical role that a experienced federal appellate lawyer plays in navigating the complexities of the appellate system.
If you’ve made it this far, we hope this article has empowered you with valuable insights and helped clarify the key points of the appellate process. If you have more questions or need expert guidance, don’t hesitate to send an online submission below, or give us a call for a consultation. Your best defense could be just a phone call away.
"*" indicates required fields
A Kentucky pain physician is acquitted of a nine-count indictment, including Unlawful Distribution and Health Care Fraud.
Our healthcare criminal lawyers’ in-depth knowledge of addiction medicine allowed our physician client to have the best possible chance at acquittal.
Healthcare fraud charges against a pain management physician were dropped after a 3 1/2-year legal battle, which stemmed from a widespread Appalachian Regional Prescription Opioid Strike Force sweep.
The United States Sentencing Commission has recently approved Amendment 821, Post Conviction Relief starting February 1st, 2024.
Our client, a home health business manager convicted of $2 million in healthcare fraud, was able to serve just three months of his 36-month sentence, arguing for “compassionate release” due to his age and health condition.
The government claimed that property taken from Dr. Joseph Oesterling was derived from illegal activity, but the appellate court struck the argument down.
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
5250 Lankershim Blvd.
Ste. 500
North Hollywood, CA 91601
T. (818) 287-0576
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Suite 120
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
701 Waterford Way
Suite 340
Miami, FL 33126
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
