Court of Appeals: Negligence Claims Can’t Be Constitutionalized
April 9, 2020 No Comments
Do allegations of negligence rise to the level of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment? The Michigan Court of Appeals says no.
Menu
Local governments and private corporations working with local government to provide services to the public often find themselves sued for gross negligence alongside medical malpractice or civil rights claims. “Gross negligence” means that the defendant’s conduct was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a conscious disregard or indifference to the life, safety or rights of persons exposed to such conduct.
Michigan law regarding governmental immunity provides immunity for governmental functions. However, gross negligence is an exception to that immunity. A governmental agency providing medical care or treatment is liable, except for medical care or treatment provided by a hospital owned or operated by the department of corrections (MCL § 691.1407). This means a correctional facility or governmental facility that contains a medical clinic or provides medical care can potentially be sued. Further, if a governmental employee is so reckless or uncaring as to cause injury through indifference to the plaintiff, liability exists.
In Florida, § 768.72 allows punitive damages if the defendant was personally guilty of intentional misconduct or gross negligence. Further, an employer can be liable for punitive damages for the conduct of an employee if:
This is a complicated issue that the healthcare civil rights attorneys of Chapman Law Group frequently address. Some federal judges have agreed that gross negligence does not apply to private companies because gross negligence is meant to be an exception to governmental immunity. Others may attempt to apply gross negligence law nevertheless, recognizing the private company may be providing a governmental function like health care.
This is a sophisticated argument best addressed by experienced, national healthcare law defense attorneys who can point out the subtle variations between state law and immunity and negligence issues. Understanding the specific implications of gross negligence can be difficult; often, plaintiff’s attorneys do not understand it.
Navigating complex litigation including gross negligence with other legal claims is not for the faint-hearted. We at Chapman Law Group have experience traversing and winning gross negligence claims on both the state and federal levels, and we can provide the kind of sophisticated argument to help you get these kinds of claims dismissed.
At Chapman Law Group, our 35 years of experience — and more than 3,000 correctional law cases litigated successfully — speak volumes. We currently handle virtually all healthcare litigation involving privately contracted health care within the Michigan Department of Corrections. Additionally, we represent the providers of more than 50 percent of the private corrections healthcare market in Michigan, and we serve the national market for gross negligence claims.
Chapman Law Group has been practicing civil rights litigation across the U.S. for 35 years. Our attorneys consider it a privilege to represent healthcare providers working in the correctional setting as well as local governments and their employees.
Our offices are in Detroit (where we serve Dearborn, Troy, Ann Arbor and Grand Rapids, and the rest of Michigan); Miami and Sarasota, Florida (for Jacksonville, Tampa, Orlando, West Palm Beach, and all of Florida); Los Angeles/Southern California; and Chicago.
Contact us today and let us put our know-how to work for you.
Do allegations of negligence rise to the level of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment? The Michigan Court of Appeals says no.
Plaintiff, a prisoner with multiple sclerosis, was unable to establish that injuries or damages were proximately caused by defendant physicians’ negligence or wrongdoing.
The inmate plaintiff was incarcerated in a county jail and complained of a skin infection from a spider bite, but he failed to file an affidavit of merit with his complaint.
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
5250 Lankershim Blvd.
Ste. 500
North Hollywood, CA 91601
T. 305.712.7177
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Suite 120
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
701 Waterford Way
Suite 340
Miami, FL 33126
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Send this to a friend