The Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol (SDP) establishes “the process for health care providers to voluntarily identify, disclose and resolves instances of potential fraud involving Federal health care programs.” It was first published by HHS-OIG in 1998. In April 2013, it was updated and republished to provide additional guidance to the health care community. The April 2013 SDP supersedes and replaces the prior SDP and all Open Letters that followed.
In keeping with its sentinel approach to program integrity, the SDP encourages self-reporting because it believes that all members of the health care community have a “legal and ethical duty” to deal with federal health care programs with integrity. The OIG provides the following benefits for disclosure:
All health care providers and suppliers who are subject to OIG’s CMP authority can use the SDP. Providers and suppliers that make a disclosure are referred to as “disclosing parties.” Disclosing parties who are already under investigation or audit are not automatically precluded from making an SDP disclosure, but they must do so in good faith. The SDP process is only for disclosing potential violations of criminal, civil or administrative laws for which CMPs are authorized – this includes the FCA and the AKS. The SDP is not to be used for reporting overpayments, which are generally reported to the MAC, or Stark law violations, which are reported to CMS through its Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol.
The disclosing party must specify the particular law and violation it is disclosing and acknowledge that the conduct being reported is a potential violation. It is equally important that the disclosing party has taken corrective actions to ensure that the conduct has ended. It is important for counsel and the client to identify the root cause of the violation and ensure that corrective action has been taken or is underway.
The SPD provides a detailed list of the requirements that must be included in the disclosure. Disclosures can be made online or submitted by mail. Where the disclosure involves the submission of improper claims, the disclosing party must conduct a review of the claims and provide a damage estimate. The SPD provides detailed guidance for this review and estimate. Of course, counsel and the client should retain the necessary outside auditors and experts to conduct this review both for the expertise and the objectivity that external auditors can provide.
Cooperation and a genuine desire to right the wrong is the essential element of the SDP. This includes submitting all information on a timely basis, communicating through a consistent and highly responsive point of contact, and being willing to pay fines and penalties on a timely basis. The OIG states, “Disclosing parties who fail to cooperate with OIG in good faith will be removed from the SDP.”
The essential components of any successful self-reporting, disclosure or settlement of a government investigation are the following:
The audit attorneys at Chapman Law Group have been helping health care providers for 35 years. We understand that with allegations of healthcare fraud, your livelihood may be at stake. We will fight to protect it, and we will work with you in making sure your healthcare practice is in compliance.
We represent providers and practices nationally — from Chicago to Los Angeles, and from Miami to Detroit — during Medicare audits, Medicaid audits and third-party payor audits. Our team of Medicare and Medicaid audit attorneys has extensive experience in Medicare audits, including ZPIC, RAC, and Safeguard (PSC) audits.
The Medicare and Medicaid audit attorneys at Chapman Law Group have been helping health care providers for 35 years. We practice across Michigan, including the Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids, Dearborn and Troy areas; in Florida (Miami, Tampa, Jacksonville, West Palm Beach, Orlando and other regions), and nationally in regions including Los Angeles and Southern California, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Washington, D.C.
We represent licensed medical professionals across the U.S., including:
Our offices are in Detroit; Miami and Sarasota, Florida; Los Angeles/Southern California; and Chicago.
With lawyers dedicated to helping providers defend their claims during audits, recovery action and appeals, you are in strong hands. Contact us today for a consultation.
A Michigan health care provider underwent a pre-payment audit to determine whether his practice’s implementation of electronic health records (“EHR”) had met the meaningful use requirements for 2015.
Healthcare Audit Defense Attorneys With So Much at Stake, Physicians and Other Health Care Providers Shouldn’t Take an Audit Letter Lightly Receiving an audit letter
December 3, 2016 – Ron Chapman Sr. and Ron Chapman II had the pleasure of presenting a continuing education class to over 375 pharmacists and technicians. Ron
OIG guidance requires that health care entities institute sufficient controls to prevent fraud waste and abuse. This includes receiving reports of suspected health care fraud,
The proposed rules for 2019 seek to add additional codes for telehealth services which were previously bundled into E/M. It also seeks to expand the
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
1001 Brickell Bay Drive
Suite 1714
Miami, FL 33131
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Send this to a friend
