The Stark Amendment to Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 — and its various amendments and administrative rules/regulations — is the federal government’s system to prevent physicians from referring patients to entities in which they have a financial interest. The Stark Amendment had a three phase implementation: Stark I, II and III.
Stark I originally only applied to physicians and their family members and prohibited self-referrals to clinical laboratories in which the physician had a financial interest.
Stark II amended the act in 1993, greatly expanding covered entities beyond physicians and clinical laboratories.
Generally, a physician is prohibited from making any referral to a person or entity in which the physician has a financial interest. This is generally referred to as physician self-referral, which is what Stark Laws are aimed to prevent.
The proponents of Stark argue such arrangements may encourage over-utilization of services, in turn driving up health care costs. In addition, they believe it would create a captive referral system, which limits competition by other providers.
Those in favor of relaxing Stark requirements argue that physicians who own, invest in or operate medical facilities are responding to a need for medical services that would otherwise not be met, particularly in medically underserved areas.
In addition, it is often the case that physician-owned entities present a lower-cost alternative to the facilities which are located at hospitals. This is due mostly to higher overhead costs that hospitals must pass down to their services.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is responsible for implementing the vast array of Stark regulations and statutes. In response, they continue to extend Stark’s reach by implementing regulations which greatly expand the definition of “financial interest.”
Currently, a financial interest involves just about anything that results in a financial benefit to the referring physician. This could include ownership, investment, gifts, freebies, financial incentives, reduced rent, reduced fees, structured compensation arrangements and unfair compensation schemes.
Yes, certain exceptions can apply to Stark Laws. For example, if the physician personally provides the services or is an employee of a medical group that provides the service, there may be no liability. This allows for multidisciplinary practices as long as the physician meets the definition of “physician in the group practice.”
There are also exceptions for in-office ancillary services. However, if the arrangement is not structured as a block lease, it may not qualify for the space and equipment lease exception. Additionally, there are Safe Harbor Regulations that make exceptions for investments in large publicly traded entities, rural physician practices, etc.
There are also a host of other exceptions to allow for rental of office space, employment and service arrangements with hospitals and certain other service arrangements. These arrangements must be at arms length and at fair market value.
The determination of whether or not your particular situations falls into one of these exceptions is a very complicated analysis and requires complete operational and financial disclosure. The risks of making an incorrect determination can be devastating.
Penalties include:
The Stark Law lawyers at Chapman Law Group are experts in making sure your practice is not running afoul of the rules and regulations.
For 35 years, we have provided compliance program consultation and development for clients all over Michigan, including the Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids, Dearborn and Troy areas; in Florida (Miami, Tampa, Jacksonville, West Palm Beach, Orlando and other regions), and nationally in regions including Los Angeles and Southern California, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Washington, D.C.
Our extensive experience in key areas of regulatory compliance in healthcare include:
We represent licensed medical professionals across the U.S., including:
Our offices are in Detroit; Miami and Sarasota, Florida; Los Angeles/Southern California; and Chicago. Contact us today for a consultation and to show what we can do for you.
Here is a hypothetical. A cardiologist with a large practice wishes to invest in a joint venture that the hospital is starting with a local
A Michigan physician was raided by the DEA and the local police department after a thorough investigation into his prescribing practices. He immediately contacted Chapman Law Group after the raid, but not before he signed a DEA form 104 surrendering his prescribing privileges.
If you are a Michigan-licensed doctor, nurse, physician’s assistant, certified nurse assistant, physical therapist, chiropractor, therapist, psychologist or psychiatrist, new changes to the Public Health
It’s simple to define what kickbacks in health care are. If a physician or medical provider uses any payment or compensation to encourage a patient
If your DEA renewal application is not received prior to the expiration of your DEA registration, you will not be allowed to handle controlled substances, and you may
Michigan OFFICE
1441 W Long Lake Road
Suite 310
Troy, MI 48098
T. 248.644.6326
F. 248.644.6324
FLORIDA OFFICES
6841 Energy Court
Sarasota, FL 34240
T. 941.893.3449
1001 Brickell Bay Drive
Suite 1714
Miami, FL 33131
T. 305.712.7177
Practice Areas
Attorneys
© CHAPMAN LAW GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Send this to a friend
